Let's watch Starship SN8 test its engines before launch!

24 nov. 2020
338 526 Weergaven

Timestamps
00:00 - Mostly Nothing
40:26 - Static Fire
41:26 - Mostly Nothing
TIME VERY SUBJECT TO CHANGE, stay tuned to twitter twitter.com/erdayastronaut for updates
Gene and Rachel from Spadre [@SouthPadreIsle] are right at the edge of the exclusion zone with one of my slow motion cameras to catch SpaceX fuel up and static fire Starship SN-8!
Follow my friends @SpacePadreIsle for all their hard work and help! - twitter.com/SpacePadreIsle
-------------------
Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - patreon.com/everydayastronaut
Or become a NLworld member for some bonus perks as well! - nlworld.info/stream/6uKrU_WqJ1R2HMTY3LIx5Q.htmljoin
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on NLworld nlworld.info

Reacties
  • Hey Tim, Do you think you could revisit the issue of Abort Systems with the recent failure of SN8 on landing? An abort system would have likely saved the lives of the hypothetical crew aboard SN8. And we can ask "How many Falcon-9 landings would have been 'Survivable' by human crew? Until now, we've only had vertical liftoff to worry about but now with landings being far more dangerous than liftoff, couldn't you revisit the concept in a new video? Perhaps even examine the concept of jettisoning the crew capsule as standard practice after re-entry and parachuting the crew safely some distance from the landing stage. Your previous video about abort systems doesn't take into account the danger of vertical landing which is a very new concept and has no statistical data to point to. Strangely, it's difficult to find statistics online for Falcon-9 landing crashes vs. success.. Also, just for extra thought for another video, consider every event that has ever caused a launch abort or delay while on the launchpad - and consider how many of them could be corrected when launching from the moon and how many would leave a stranded crew on the Lunar surface.

    AndysailsAndysailsMaand geleden
    • Same thing with the launch, makes the system much more reliable through many launches If we're so conservative like that, I'm shocked as to why there's no abort system for reentry. I mean, it's just as dangerous right?

      Alvian Choiri ApriliansyahAlvian Choiri ApriliansyahMaand geleden
  • I can't watch Scott Manley anymore. I will have to do without his analysis.

    Duane DieterichDuane DieterichMaand geleden
  • The disillusioned parade mechanically obtain because denim alternately raise round a illegal street. thinkable, gabby museum

    Hannah LogarskiHannah LogarskiMaand geleden
  • Did it not lift

    Richard buntRichard buntMaand geleden
  • What's wrong with focus?

    James CallonJames CallonMaand geleden
  • bout' a 2 second static fire

    that raresthat raresMaand geleden
  • I think even when you are trolled there is still lots of love there. May be naughty but fun.

    John StittJohn StittMaand geleden
  • 20th Century technology makes me feel so nostalgic.

    anon. akianon. akiMaand geleden
  • 0

    ประสิทธิ์ หุ่นบรรจงประสิทธิ์ หุ่นบรรจงMaand geleden
  • Im verry nervous about that hop its like those games where you. Start all over again when you fail

    space is coolspace is coolMaand geleden
  • More ceramic chips blown away... :-\ Edit: It seems to be very problematic if they have to fix the concrete pad every time,..., maybe the static fires are just to test the issue. Imagine the damage with full force 3 engines breathing fire. Imagine if the rocket is supposed to land on that same spot after the 15 hop 😲

    Marc AbelhaMarc AbelhaMaand geleden
  • 1hr50? WTF? Pass 👎

    Paul ZernickPaul ZernickMaand geleden
    • Man, if only we split the timeline up for you so you know exactly when the (unknown time to us) test occurred, or even better posted just the test in 4K slow motion on a separate 2 minute video... oh wait 🤔

      Everyday AstronautEveryday AstronautMaand geleden
  • was this like the pre-burner test they ran, just before last month's full on burns?

    lucky irvinlucky irvinMaand geleden
  • that vehicle is absolutely lovely in that golden sunlight

    lucky irvinlucky irvinMaand geleden
  • I still see bits and pieces of metal being dispersed after the engines were fired up. Hope damage was minor.

    Dee BeeDee BeeMaand geleden
  • so you can abort after fire? i though once it went off it were 50/50 live or die

    Daniel NaNDaniel NaNMaand geleden
  • I'm so excited when I see this!

    Dmitry MelnikovDmitry MelnikovMaand geleden
  • Elon is the best. Second richest person in the world, still responding to the little people's questions while they're testing a vehicle.

    Joy LJoy LMaand geleden
  • 136 flat-earthers didn't like this video.

    Matt EvansMatt EvansMaand geleden
  • Is BFR and starship the same vehicle with a name change?

    cptm rcptm rMaand geleden
    • Yup!!!

      Everyday AstronautEveryday AstronautMaand geleden
  • best time stamps of any video.

    IckyIckyMaand geleden
  • You definitely need to get your old high altitude flight suit hanging or on a manaquin!

    Trif 55Trif 55Maand geleden
  • Will longer take off and landing legs help avoid some of the debris? Maybe these legs can have more than one function like maybe some steering and air braking during landing ?

    William GrimbergWilliam GrimbergMaand geleden
  • Tirm Derdd said dirt berm. :)

    william Greenewilliam GreeneMaand geleden
  • So how many homeless people can you feed with your cable bill? How many hungry children can you feed in Africa with it?

    Leto IdahoLeto IdahoMaand geleden
  • boring. nothing happing

    Willem van der plaatWillem van der plaatMaand geleden
  • STEEL PLATES 1'' THICK ON LAUNCH PAD ? WHY NOT ?

    paul ben'jamin' barxpaul ben'jamin' barxMaand geleden
  • phase 1. start, phase 2. survive lol.

    Lakario DavisLakario DavisMaand geleden
  • 40:26

    Rachel GuidoRachel GuidoMaand geleden
  • I have a fun merch idea you might like but I'm not sure, every time I see your vids I automatically read you name as 'Everyday Astro-nut' because you're not an astronaut but you are nuts about space lol So you could have everyday above a but (the type that screws on a bolt) with 'Astro' written or stamped into it? lol

    Scott BishopScott BishopMaand geleden
  • Welding on the rocket appears to be much smoother than previous Starships.. Perhaps aerodynamics is a factor at test speeds and attitudes.

    Toby WToby WMaand geleden
  • IT HASNT BLOWN UP YET ELON

    angela bugejaangela bugejaMaand geleden
  • Hey Tim. My name is Emillio i am 68 retired Airline pilot. I am headed to Boca next month for the winter. Me and my 4 dogs in my SprinterVan. 85 degrees hete we come.

    CaribbeanZapattaCaribbeanZapattaMaand geleden
  • still saw hot concrete flying about

    Brian wildBrian wildMaand geleden
  • Love your timestamp labels, haha.

    nitehawk86nitehawk86Maand geleden
  • Thank you for another grat stream. Too bad those things happen at a weird time for EU customers. And I think that SpaceX would be really awesome if they would put a large clock on the side there that would announce (for this view angle) the last minute before something interesting happens.

    Kata SeikoKata SeikoMaand geleden
  • Hi, Tim. I have not heard of any, but wouldn't it be prudent to run such a monster though a windtunnel (or a vertical 'wind-trampoline') before sending it to a freefall from 15km? I have many times wondered about the untried 'flaps' (or elonerons, as you call them... :-D ) and their sturdiness and aerodynamic behaviour - a windtunnel would give an idea about their behaviour in supersonic/transsonic/subsonic environments. But I confess that I have never seen a single youtube video, or technical paper on windtunnel/windtrampoline testing of this new spacecraft... Do you have knowledge of any such tests? Thx

    Siggi MatosSiggi MatosMaand geleden
    • Wind tunnel testing is one reason SpaceX changed from 3 ailerons to 2 top & 2 bottom. Most of that testing involves scale models, because there are very few wind tunnels that can accommodate something this large.

      TraditionalAnglicanTraditionalAnglicanMaand geleden
  • Please add 01:23:28 in your description for Rocket Lab video. This section is great.

    Uche OjiUche OjiMaand geleden
  • lol, thisvideo title should be "mostly nothing" :p

    A FrogA FrogMaand geleden
  • A little bit of clickbait

    Pol VallsPol VallsMaand geleden
  • Cam 4 commentary was awful for this SF . I'm sticking with this guy from now on .

    telfordguy34uktelfordguy34ukMaand geleden
  • Please can someone explain to me simply what i saw? 🤯

    SHAY HIGHSHAY HIGHMaand geleden
    • Fire

      Seymor OnionSeymor OnionMaand geleden
  • Great stuff as always !

    Simon AnthonySimon AnthonyMaand geleden
  • 40:41 the rocket is gone

    Johann Pernia-FullerosJohann Pernia-FullerosMaand geleden
  • those marks in the videos are super nice for this type of content! thanks YT

    RoestiRoestiMaand geleden
  • why is the biggest dildo ever made trying to go into space... oh yeah!

    ragegod borgataragegod borgataMaand geleden
    • it looks too fat and too short, i think a longer, thinner rocket would fly better, like mine. i am a rocket scientist of course

      ragegod borgataragegod borgataMaand geleden
  • You've titled ur video Mostly Nothing for more than 99% of the video and u still have 250K views. Isn't that pretty ? :)

    Dgboss78Dgboss78Maand geleden
  • hahaha that was so funny, I'm glad you now know what the "Mike" reference was, and wow you kept saying it over and over rofl.

    Grav -Grav -Maand geleden
  • Who knows.. 20-30 years from now we might also see a SpaceX Sea Dragon being made or going through tests like this.

    smruti ranjan jenasmruti ranjan jenaMaand geleden
  • Yes

    Gig27Gig27Maand geleden
  • Too short, probably another 'emergency don't let the whole thing explode' abort.

    YeshuaAgapaoYeshuaAgapaoMaand geleden
  • Too short. Prepare for another "Incomplete."

    N. SmithN. SmithMaand geleden
  • Current design Starship can only get to orbit. That's it. It cannot fly to Mars and even to Moon. For Mars starship doesn't have Full G design for astronauts to stay healthy. For Moon it doesn't have mid size installed engines to land on Moon. So far Starship doesn't solve the landing leg design for landing on unprepared surfaces of Moon or Mars. The name "Starship" its not implemented into the current design at all. They should name it Orbiter or something like that. That's it. For the Mars Elon need to build different type of Rocket.( rotating Von Braun like for Full G ) Current design Starship will never fly to Mars with people on board. That's the logic.

    Tigran OhanyanTigran OhanyanMaand geleden
  • That stage separation was some Sci Fi "Expanse" worthy footage! Loved the Sound Blast as the engine ignited!

    Elmond Huff Jr.Elmond Huff Jr.Maand geleden
  • If they are going to fly this thing up to 15 km, I would like to see them do a static fire that lasts more than a couple of seconds.

    Odysseus RexOdysseus RexMaand geleden
    • They do extended test fires for the raptor engines (unmounted) but I don't think the SN8 hold down clamps can take more than a second or two of full thrust.

      NolspNolspMaand geleden
  • Technically, even my pale butt flies when my thrust to weight ratio goes over 1

    richierescuerichierescueMaand geleden
    • Yes, but ignition is a bummer!

      Robert MasonRobert MasonMaand geleden
  • Can you imagine that gargantuan rocket launching from an offshore oil rig!

    Scott ReScott ReMaand geleden
    • No, actually. I think it will have to be a far more substantial structure.

      Odysseus RexOdysseus RexMaand geleden
  • Can't wait to watch the skydive grain silo

    CIA - Virtual AssitantCIA - Virtual AssitantMaand geleden
  • 1:25:32 A cool shot of the pay-load Separation death camera~

    Mark JMark JMaand geleden
    • @MrPabgon twitter

      real life and gamesreal life and gamesMaand geleden
    • Where can I find it on NLworld?

      MrPabgonMrPabgonMaand geleden
  • I'm full blown dying. 46:30 that slayed me. I can't see.

    arfynessarfynessMaand geleden
  • Obama To NASA: "Let The Media Company Pay For It"?!?

    Larry E. Goines Jr.Larry E. Goines Jr.Maand geleden
  • commenting to help the youtube algorithm

    mattis117mattis117Maand geleden
  • That was an A norminaly eh?

    boatbyrdboatbyrdMaand geleden
  • OH NO!! OOOH....THATS (Tim proceeds to have a heart attack thinking it was a RUD)

    GrummanPilot99GrummanPilot99Maand geleden
    • @Andy Levy It's more like a "term of endeerment" in the space industry fanbase that made it popular. It was aledgedly used in the military way before, some claim the use of "rapid unintentional disassembly" for an exploding misused gun. And for me Kerbal Space Programm carried it out to pop culture. Another claim is, it was used for an exploding Saturn V Stage on a teststand in the 60s.

      NavySeal2kNavySeal2kMaand geleden
    • @Yonatan S thanks. Is that the official classification for any vehicle that explodes unexpectedly eg: Columbia or even a test rocket? Is it only used in space related scenarios or also general aviation?

      Andy LevyAndy LevyMaand geleden
    • @Andy Levy rapid unscheduled disassembly

      Yonatan SYonatan SMaand geleden
    • what is a RUD?

      Andy LevyAndy LevyMaand geleden
  • 1:45:03

    antony moran 123antony moran 123Maand geleden
    • Best 15 seconds of my life

      Rachel GuidoRachel GuidoMaand geleden
  • That Sucked! That Tin Can will never be used more than once! Come on folks!

    Christopher BurbidgeChristopher BurbidgeMaand geleden
  • NASA Got Defunded When NASA TV Started Charging, Sad?!?

    Larry E. Goines Jr.Larry E. Goines Jr.Maand geleden
  • Fan

    Linda MulhollandLinda MulhollandMaand geleden
  • Thanks To Dominion, Technology Looks Like A Joke Right Now?

    Larry E. Goines Jr.Larry E. Goines Jr.Maand geleden
  • You said 40min minimum delay mars communication. Sounds rich🤔 you meant maximum?

    Ngendo MuhayimanaNgendo Muhayimana2 maanden geleden
  • so nice of you to tag the time line... mostly nothing | static fire | mostly nothing

    Munindra MohantaMunindra Mohanta2 maanden geleden
  • The static fire is over, now when ON EARTH IS THE 15 KILOMETER HOP??!!

    Dhanashri kulkarniDhanashri kulkarni2 maanden geleden
    • Elon's Tweet says next week. We have a closure on 30th so I believe 30th for the flight

      IG RohanIG RohanMaand geleden
  • why don't they just use a flame trench instead of blowing up the concrete every test or launch?

    Jon ShafferJon Shaffer2 maanden geleden
  • You were not alone in thinking this iteration of starship was about to become a giant, pyrotechnically impressive disappointment. Kind of like a reverse analogy for a sweet and sour sauce of emotions because the surge of disappointment and frustration was negated by intense relief occurring only a little bit slower but being much more welcome. A lack of any countdown or timeline across the bottom of the screen left us with no warning and I think anticipation for a worst case scenario is semi-instinctive when something like that catches us unawares. This is probably because pessimism is rarely disappointing and we all like to be not only right but to back a winning team. Consequently we tend to adopt a progressively stronger if ultimately only mildly fatalistic attitude after a string of tests have been less than successful according to our expectations. But as you said Elon Musk and his team are daring to work outside established parameters and tests in that realm are not consistently failures because ways to progress are so often gained from them. When ultimately rewarded by progress setbacks and frustrations are merely expensive ways of learning how not to do something and the alternative to daring to try is excessive conservatism. The consequences of that are exemplified by how absurd levels of obstructive 'can't do' attitudes seriously hindered men of genius in Britain from a time prior to WWII virtually until now, particularly at bureaucratic levels. Sir Frank Whittle, R. J. Mitchell, Barnes Wallis and Sir Stanley Hooker are but a few examples of men who forged ahead against conservative obstructionism and essentially saved Britain from itself by doing so. But they too paid a high price for a relatively small measure of gratitude or recognition. I recently watched a documentary on NLworld about development for the Lightning which was the first English supersonic fighter. It illustrated how, despite the harsh lessons of WWII, restraint exerted by conservative thinking kept English research and development for supersonic aircraft lagging behind the United States and Russia by at least a decade. How fortunate that despite it we still have visionaries like Elon Musk who are prepared to stake everything on defying influences still steadily creating an increasingly regimented and over regulated world despite the disadvantages.

    whotknotswhotknots2 maanden geleden
    • That documentary about the lightning sounds interesting. Can you post the link, or give its full title?

      Odysseus RexOdysseus RexMaand geleden
    • Agreed, the thing I dislike about conservatism. Expect failure and that's what you'll get.

      Len GouldLen GouldMaand geleden
  • Look likes 1 Engine Fired...Your Right...💯🚦🚧🚦😎

    Iccassini -5Iccassini -52 maanden geleden
  • I was the one who asked about will space x stop launching falcon 9 and falcon heavy after starship flies. I just wanted to thank for clearing up some confusion it was something that bothered me because i didnt want to see one of my favorite rockets stop flying so soon especially with the commercial crew flights being so recent. I know I probably sound dumb but I'm just a kid who has a big dream to look to. I watch your videos all the time because it just inspires me to look to my future. Thank you Wow this turned out to be... Emotional...

    Bryson StephensBryson Stephens2 maanden geleden
    • I mean, it is just that once you have a fully reusable system, you won't win a lot by using a partially reusable system. There will be a period where both interlap as new starships get made and more and more get used, but eventually starship will have to step into both falcon 9 and falcon heavy's job. After all, starship is suposed to be a jab at creating an universal space transportation design, something that "kind of works" no matter what task you ask of it.

      Adrien MansuyAdrien MansuyMaand geleden
  • I can't believe you got hit with the Mike Hunt troll 🤣

    ultimategoteaultimategotea2 maanden geleden
    • That was glorious. "Getting trolled by everyday people" 🤣🤣🤣

      Ben IBen IMaand geleden
    • @Edwin Robert 1:45:05

      fetBfetBMaand geleden
    • 1:50 hahahaha

      Matt LeaverMatt LeaverMaand geleden
    • not to mention the sildenafil powered flaps lol

      Mike WheatleyMike WheatleyMaand geleden
    • @Edwin Robert at the very end

      Christopher WangChristopher WangMaand geleden
  • That looks like a computer shut down the test before something bad was about to happen.

    James BarisitzJames Barisitz2 maanden geleden
  • Please lets buy Tim a metronome

    Fabio GrimaldiFabio Grimaldi2 maanden geleden
  • Static fire was successful. SN8 on track for first altitude flight next week. Elon says there’s a 1/3 chance all goes well during the test but that’s why there is SN9 and SN10

    lizzo001lizzo0012 maanden geleden
  • I'm dying to see this thing fly for real =)

    Friday CaliforniaaFriday Californiaa2 maanden geleden
  • Wtf was the ending about?

    greensky01greensky012 maanden geleden
    • Is English your first language and are you older than 12? If the answer is no to either. I might not be in a position to explain it very easily.

      Kye HuelinKye HuelinMaand geleden
  • It was great to watch that along with Tim. Really intelligent observations and the heart of a true believer. Dude I think you may have forked over one of your nine lives!

    Markus RobinsonMarkus Robinson2 maanden geleden
    • Just one? My guess is that Tim is Elons long lost younger brother. :D

      AllisterCaineAllisterCaineMaand geleden
  • I missed it, dang it.

    MrTopheadMrTophead2 maanden geleden
  • Snuck That One In.. Surprise... Did They Shatter the Cement Again..?

    Bubba ConwayBubba Conway2 maanden geleden
  • AND Blabbing away the Whole time... Just like the. NASA space kids...!!

    Anna FraleyAnna Fraley2 maanden geleden
  • this was a three-engine static fire, right?

    Jazzy LevJazzy Lev2 maanden geleden
  • Light the candle, already!!

    Escape VelocityEscape Velocity2 maanden geleden
  • I have a module to answer but this is more important

    Dirk Allen GarciaDirk Allen Garcia2 maanden geleden
    • Same pre hahahaha

      Booyah ChinksBooyah Chinks2 maanden geleden
  • 40:20

    Jhoan Martinez SilvaJhoan Martinez Silva2 maanden geleden
  • Everyday Poopstronaut

    MilwaukeeMaxMilwaukeeMax2 maanden geleden
  • When Starship is running like a Yellow Cab, a camera cage running a top to bottom rotating inspection of the hull, fins, tiles would be extremely helpful for turn around times. Spit balling here.

    James BarisitzJames Barisitz2 maanden geleden
  • Sun starts setting at around 43:30

    Sukacita YeremiaSukacita Yeremia2 maanden geleden
  • I KNEW IT!!!! I knew you would hear the exhaust of the second stage from the interstage at separation. It's bring your own atmosphere!!! I bugged Elon 50 times on twitter for audio from Falcon 9. W0000 rocketlab!!!

    jcimsjcims2 maanden geleden
    • @Anonymously Anonymous ah yes I forgot about that

      real life and gamesreal life and gamesMaand geleden
    • @real life and games rocket exhaust hitting the audio equipment transmits sounds

      Anonymously AnonymousAnonymously AnonymousMaand geleden
    • Isn’t it because when they separate there is still a little bit of atmosphere and rocket engines are loud so you can still hear them. Also if there would be no atmosphere how do you explain the sound traveling trough a vacuum, because when the engine fires it’s already away from the first stage.

      real life and gamesreal life and gamesMaand geleden
  • When is the 15K?!!!!!!

    WIllIam Edwards PhotoGraphicWIllIam Edwards PhotoGraphic2 maanden geleden
    • On track for next week. I’m not sure on date 😅

      lizzo001lizzo0012 maanden geleden
  • 🚀 I Love how SpaceX threw you all off by doing that Static fire at that moment. Not one of you SpaceX Hosts were ready for that. I checked every LIVE Link and EVERYBODY was caught off Guard. It was billiant, As if "Elon" was sending a Message to Everyone, "Expect the Unexpected", I Run this Show, Beeeaches❗ 🤣😂🤣 I Love this Crap❗

    JON R WieszchowskiJON R Wieszchowski2 maanden geleden
  • Dude! Good job on the quiet intro! Saved my life.

    David WakkaDavid Wakka2 maanden geleden
  • The plume is a mass ejection, the sound can travel through it as a medium. While in the plume you would temporarily not be in a vacuum.

    Mike JansonMike Janson2 maanden geleden
    • Also the exhaust and plume-turbulence itself physically messes with the mike. This is why wind-coverings are put on microphones outdoors. We don't hear the wind, per se. We hear the microphone as the wind strikes against the housing.

      I TF· ·FR ME· ·R ATE TenFramesPerSecondI TF· ·FR ME· ·R ATE TenFramesPerSecond2 maanden geleden
  • @joshua_s should go to Super Chat jail for that troll. Poor Tim. 😳

    Lisa BowersLisa Bowers2 maanden geleden
  • How much fuel is added for a static fire vs hop? I understand it has some venting after a static fire.

    R JonesR Jones2 maanden geleden
NLworld